Operator strategy
How to Evaluate an iGaming Affiliate Network Before Joining
Ask for evidence of how the relationship would work. A large partner count tells you much less than a clear answer about your first campaign.

An iGaming affiliate network can present an impressive collection of logos, markets and traffic claims. As a casino operator, your decision is narrower: can this provider support your brand in the markets you serve, under terms you understand, with reporting you can use?
Evaluate the proposed working relationship rather than the size of the presentation. The framework below gives you a consistent way to compare providers and identify questions that need answers before a launch.
Ask what the network actually provides
Begin by distinguishing access from management. Does the service introduce partners, maintain a listing, supply tracking, coordinate campaigns or handle ongoing performance reviews? Which activities are included, and which require your team or another supplier?
Ask the provider to walk through the sequence from inquiry to first campaign. You should be able to identify review, agreement, setup, testing and launch as separate steps. If the answer skips straight from signup to results, ask what happens in between.
Write the responsibilities down. A broad description such as full service becomes useful only when it explains who handles an asset change, a tracking discrepancy or a campaign pause.
Evaluate relevant reach rather than aggregate size
Ask about the types of partners and placements suitable for your permitted markets, languages and offer. A total network count does not tell you how many partners are active or interested in your particular campaign.
Useful evidence might include anonymized examples of similar campaign setups, placement categories or a discussion of the first proposed source. Respect confidentiality, but expect enough specificity to assess fit. A provider can explain its process without disclosing another operator's private data.
Separate historical evidence from forecasts. A past result in another market is context, not a promise that your brand will reproduce it. Ask which differences would affect the comparison.
Request a reporting walkthrough
Have the provider explain an example report from click through qualification and settlement. Ask how campaign identifiers distinguish sources, how delayed events appear and what happens when the two sides disagree about a total.
Check whether you can export the information your team needs and whether conversion statuses are defined. Ask how the provider handles duplicate events and corrections. These details become particularly important when your internal finance or analytics team must reconcile the data.
A dashboard demonstration should end with understanding, not simply an attractive chart. You should be able to explain what one row means and what action it could support.
Use a scorecard, with evidence beside each score
Score each area from zero to two: zero means unresolved, one means explained but not demonstrated, and two means supported by relevant evidence. This is an internal decision aid, not an industry certification. A high total should never cancel out a critical unresolved requirement.
| Area | Evidence to request |
|---|---|
| Market fit | Relevant source types and a plausible initial campaign scope |
| Service scope | Written responsibilities and approval boundaries |
| Tracking | Integration requirements and a test plan |
| Reporting | Sample report, field definitions and export options |
| Commercial terms | Full calculation, validation and settlement process |
| Support | Named contacts, escalation route and backup coverage |
| Change control | Process for offer updates, pauses and asset replacement |
| Exit process | Rules for ending activity and resolving outstanding reporting |
Put a short note beside every score. Explained on a call and demonstrated in a test are different levels of evidence. If two providers score similarly, the notes often reveal which is a better operational fit.
Read the commercial and exit terms together
Review the commission structure, fees, qualification rules, validation window and payment schedule. Ask about exclusivity, source restrictions and how changes to terms are communicated. Your team should understand what happens to outstanding activity if the relationship ends.
Avoid assuming that a low upfront cost means low total cost. Equally, do not assume a more expensive service includes more management. Compare the actual responsibilities and calculations using the same campaign assumptions.
Use the network versus in-house comparison to check whether external support solves a real gap in your current setup.
Evaluate ConversionHunt using the same questions
ConversionHunt describes a managed acquisition service with partner coordination, campaign setup and reporting, and states no retainers and no minimum commitment on its operator page. Ask how that service would apply to your brand, markets and proposed offer. Campaign commissions and qualification rules still need to be agreed.
Bring your scorecard to the conversation. Ask what information you need to provide, how tracking will be tested and what the first review would cover. A useful provider discussion should make the next step more concrete, not leave you with a larger collection of promises.
Your final decision should be based on fit, clear terms and an operating process your team can work with. Those qualities remain useful long after the sales presentation is forgotten.
Frequently asked questions
What should I ask an affiliate network first?
Ask what it provides and how that service applies to your markets and offer. Then request a walkthrough from inquiry to launch, including responsibilities, tracking tests and reporting.
Is a large affiliate count proof that a network is right for my casino?
No. You need relevant, active partners and suitable placements for your campaign. Ask about audience fit and the proposed initial scope rather than relying on aggregate counts.
Should I ask to see a sample report?
Yes. A sample helps you assess field definitions, source visibility, validation statuses and reconciliation. The provider can use anonymized or synthetic data to protect confidentiality.
What would justify delaying a decision?
Unclear qualification rules, unexplained fees, missing tracking ownership or an inability to describe source visibility are reasons to resolve questions before launching. Treat critical gaps separately from a scorecard total.